orders

India initiates antitrust investigation on Google’s app marketplace billing procedures

Gettyimages 942662750 2
India’s antitrust regulator has ordered an investigation into Alphabet’s Google, alleging the U.S. tech giant abused its dominant position in the country’s online market by imposing unfair terms and discriminatory practices in its popular app store. The order came in response to complaint filed by multiple Indian app developers and industry groups, many of whom have also publicly raised concerns about what they allege is unfair practices by Google. CCI’s allegations centre around Google’s billing system for in-app purchases and paid apps on its Play Store. The watchdog’s decision is the latest headache for Google in India, its biggest market by users but one where it has long faced allegations of anti-competitive practices. The U.S. giant has previously defended its Play Store policies, saying the service fee supports its investments in Android and Play Store, allowing it to provide developers with tools and a global platform to access billions of consumers around the world.

Construction of small business B2B commerce platform by Catalog

Hexa 2023 C Julien Mouffron Gardner 129
When you think about commerce platforms, chances are the first names that come to mind are big names like Adobe Commerce or Salesforce Commerce Cloud. That’s why a French startup called Catalog wants to build a software-as-a-service product that seamlessly manages B2B sales across several sales channels. But these tools don’t necessarily work well for B2B companies. This way, the company hopes it can handle the majority of B2B orders for companies that have decided to use Catalog. By focusing on small and medium businesses, Catalog could start offering a wide range of services that are specifically tailored for these small manufacturing and commerce companies.

India receives orders from Musk’s X to withhold accounts and tweets

Twitter X Logo Musk Pattern
X, formerly known as Twitter, said Wednesday it is withholding specific accounts and posts in India, action it said the firm disagrees with, in response to executive orders issued by the Indian government. Non-compliance with the executive orders, X said, would have subjected the firm to “potential penalties including significant fines and imprisonment.”X’s Global Government Affairs said legal restrictions prevent it from publishing the executive orders, but “we believe that making them public is essential for transparency.” X will file a writ appeal challenging the Indian government’s blocking orders, it said, and has notified users who are impacted by the orders. The disclosure from X follows New Delhi ordering to temporarily block about 177 accounts and posts surrounding farmers’ protests in the country. As privacy advocate Apar Gupta wrote in a recent post on X:Blocking orders for Twitter accounts of farm leaders have been issued in advance. This is not surprising, what does provide anguish is the vile commentary against farmers on social media.

FTC Mandates Transparency from AI Businesses: Disclosing Investments, Collaborations, and Conferences

Ftc Building 1
The FTC is aiming to unravel the complex and secretive corporate relationships in the top AI companies out there in a new inquiry. What are these companies but a proxy for the ambitions of the extant tech superpowers? As companies race to develop and monetize AI, we must guard against tactics that foreclose this opportunity,” Khan continued in her statement. The orders sent to the companies listed above compel them to share:Partnerships, investments, and the “strategic rationale” for themWhether these partnerships have “practical implications” such as when or how new products are releasedWhat do they talk about at meetings? After all, why shouldn’t companies that have already spent billions pursuingIncidentally, today the FTC is hosting a summit on AI and its opportunities and dangers, in the sense of markets and startups.

FTC Demands Transparency from AI Firms: Insights into Investments, Collaborations, and Conferences

Ftc Building
The FTC is aiming to unravel the complex and secretive corporate relationships in the top AI companies out there in a new inquiry. What are these companies but a proxy for the ambitions of the extant tech superpowers? As companies race to develop and monetize AI, we must guard against tactics that foreclose this opportunity,” Khan continued in her statement. The orders sent to the companies listed above compel them to share:Partnerships, investments, and the “strategic rationale” for themWhether these partnerships have “practical implications” such as when or how new products are releasedWhat do they talk about at meetings? After all, why shouldn’t companies that have already spent billions pursuingIncidentally, today the FTC is hosting a summit on AI and its opportunities and dangers, in the sense of markets and startups.

X-Mode Prohibited from Selling Phone Location Data by FTC, and Required to Erase Gathered Information

Gettyimages 1392356345
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has banned the data broker X-Mode Social from sharing or selling users’ sensitive location data, the federal regulator said Tuesday. The settlement will also require the data broker to delete or destroy all the location data it previously collected, along with any products produced from this data, unless the company obtains consumer consent or ensures the data has been de-identified. X-Mode buys and sells access to the location data collected from ordinary phone apps. While just one of many organizations in the multibillion-dollar data broker industry, X-Mode faced scrutiny for selling access to the commercial location data of Americans’ past movements to the U.S. government and military contractors. Since its inception, X-Mode has imposed strict contractual terms on all data customers prohibiting them from associating its data with sensitive locations such as healthcare facilities.

“VF Corp Reports Stolen Personal Data and Disrupted Orders Following Suspected Ransomware Attack on Vans and Supreme”

Vfc Brands Vans Supreme Cyberattack
VF Corporation, the U.S.-based owner of apparel brands including Vans, Supreme, and The North Face, has confirmed a cyberattack has impacted the company’s ability to fulfill orders ahead of Christmas, one of the biggest retail events of the year. When reached by email, VF Corp. spokesperson Colin Wheeler provided TechCrunch with a statement that echoed the company’s filing with regulators. In its regulatory filing, VF Corp. warned that the cyberattack would have a “material impact” on its business until its systems are recovered. VF Corp disclosed the incident on the same day that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s new data breach disclosure rules came into force. This regulation means that organizations must report cybersecurity incidents, including data breaches, to the federal government’s securities regulator within four business days.